The Z-Shell, `zsh' for short, is a command interpreter for UNIX systems, or in UNIX jargon, a `shell', because it wraps around the commands you use. More than that, however, zsh is a particularly powerful shell --- and it's free, and under regular maintenance --- with lots of interactive features allowing you to do the maximum work with the minimum fuss. Of course, for that you need to know what the shell can do and how, and that's what this guide is for.
The most basic basics: I shall assume you have access to a UNIX system, otherwise the rest of this is not going to be much use. You can also use zsh under Windows by installing Cygwin, which provides a UNIX-like environment for programmes --- given the weakness of the standard Windows command interpreter, this is a good thing to do. There are ports of older versions of zsh to Windows which run natively, i.e. without a UNIX environment, although these have a slightly different behaviour in some respects and I won't talk about them further.
I'll also assume some basic knowledge of UNIX; you should know how the
filesystem works, i.e. what /home/users/pws/.zshrc and ../file
mean, and some basic commands, for example ls, and you should have
experience with using rm to delete completely the wrong file by
accident, and that sort of thing. In something like `rm file', I will
often refer to the `command' (rm, of course) and the `argument(s)'
(anything else coming after the command which is used by it), and to the
complete thing you typed in one go as the `command line'.
You're also going to need zsh itself; if you're reading this, you may well already have it, but if you don't, you or your system administrator should read Appendix A. For now, we'll suppose you're sitting in front of a terminal with zsh already running.
Now to the shell. After you log in, you probably see some prompt (a
series of symbols on the screen indicating that you can input a command),
such as `$' or `%', possibly with some other text in front ---
later, we'll see how you can change that text in interesting ways. That
prompt comes from the shell. Type `print hello', then backspace over
`hello' and type `goodbye'. Now hit the `Return' key (or `Enter'
key, I'll just say <RET> from now on, likewise <TAB> for the tab
key, <SPC> for the space key); unless you have a serious
practical-joker problem on your system, you will see `goodbye', and
the shell will come back with another prompt. All of the time up to when
you hit <RET>, you were interacting with the shell and its editor,
called `Z-Shell Line Editor' or `zle' for short; only then did the shell go
away and tell the print command to print out a message. So you can see
that the shell is important.
However, if all you're doing is typing simple commands like that, why do you need anything complicated? In that case, you don't; but real life's not that simple. In the rest of this guide, I describe how, with zsh's help, you can:
mv or ls using zsh's very sophisticated filename generation
(known colloquially as `globbing') system,
Some other things you should probably know straight away. First, the shell
is always running, even when the command you typed is running, too; the
shell simply hangs around waiting for it to finish: you may know from other
shells about putting commands in the background by putting an `&'
after the command, which means that the shell doesn't wait for them to
finish. The shell is there even if the command's in the foreground, but in
this case doing nothing.
Second, it doesn't just run other people's commands, it has some of its own, called builtin commands or just builtins, and you can even add your own commands as lists of instructions to the shell called functions; builtins and functions always run in the shell itself. That's important to know, because things which don't run in the shell itself can't affect it, and hence can't alter parameters, functions, aliases, and all the other things I shall talk about.
If you want a basic grounding in how shells work, what their syntax is (i.e. how to write commands), and how to write scripts and functions, you should read one of the many books on the subject. In particular, you will get most out of a book that describes the Korn shell (ksh), as zsh is very similar to this --- so similar that it will be worth my while pointing out differences as we go along, since they can confuse ksh users. Recent versions of zsh can emulate ksh (strictly, the 1988 version of ksh, although there are increasingly features from the 1993 version) quite closely, although it's not perfect, and less perfect the more closely you look. However, it's important to realise that if you just start up any old zsh there is no guarantee that it will be set up to work like ksh; unless you or your system adminstrator have changed some settings, it certainly won't be. You might not see that straight away, but it affects the shell in subtle ways. I will talk about emulation a bit more later on.
A few other shells are worth mentioning. The grandfather of all UNIX shells is sh, now known as the Bourne shell but originally just referred to as `the shell'. The story is similar to ksh: zsh can emulate sh quite closely (much more closely than ksh, since sh is considerably simpler), but in general you need to make sure it's set up to do that before you can be sure it will emulate sh.
You may also come across the `Bourne-Again Shell', bash. This is a freely-available enhancement of sh written by the GNU project --- but it is not always enhanced along the lines of ksh, and hence in many ways it is very different from zsh. On some free UNIX-like systems such as Linux/GNU (which is what people usually mean by Linux), the command sh is really bash, so there you should be extra careful when trying to ensure that something which runs under the so-called `sh' will also run under zsh. Some Linux systems also have another simpler Bourne shell clone, ash; as it's simpler, it's more like the original Bourne shell.
Some more modern operating systems talk about `the POSIX shell'. This is an attempt to standardize UNIX shells; it's most like the Korn shell, although, a bit confusingly, it's often just called sh, because the standard says that it should be. Usually, this just means you get a bit extra free with your sh and it still does what you expect. Zsh has made some attempts to fit the standard, but you have to tell it to --- again, simply starting up `zsh' will not have the right settings for that.
There is another common family of shells with, unfortunately, incompatible syntax. The source of this family is the C-Shell, csh, so called because its syntax looks more like the C programming language. This became widespread when the only other shell available was sh because csh had better interactive features, such as job control. It was then enhanced to make tcsh, which has many of the interactive features you will also find in zsh, and so became very popular. Despite these common features, the syntax of zsh is very different, so you should not try and use csh/tcsh commands beyond the very simplest in zsh; but if you are a tcsh user, you will find virtually every capability you are used to in zsh somewhere, plus a lot more.
At the time of writing, the most recent version of zsh available for widespread use was 4.0.6. You will commonly find two sets of older zsh's around. The 3.0 series, of which the last release was 3.0.9, was a stable release, with only bug fixes since the first release of zsh 3. The 3.1 series were beta versions, with lots of new features; the last of these, 3.1.9, was not so different from 4.0.1; the main change is that the shell has now been declared stable, so that as with zsh 3 there will be a set of bug fixes, labelled 4.0, and a set with new functions in, labelled 4.1. As 4.0 replaces all zsh 3 versions, I will try to keep things simple and talk about that; but every now and then it will be helpful to point out where older versions were different.
One notable feature of zsh is the completion of command line arguments. The system changed in 3.1.6 and 3.1.7 to make it a lot more configurable, and (provided you keep your wits about you) a little less obscure. I therefore won't describe the old completion system, which used the `compctl' command, in any detail; a very brief introduction is given in the zsh FAQ. The old system remains available, however we strongly recommend new users to start with the new one. See chapter 6 `Completion, old and new' for the lowdown on new-style completion.
There won't be a big difference between 4.0 and 4.1, just bug fixes and a few evolutionary changes, plus some extra modules. There will be some notes in chapter 7 about new features in 4.1, but nothing you write for 4.0 is likely to become obsolete in the foreseeable future.
Most of what I say will be reasonably self-contained (which means I use phrases like `as I said before' and `as I'll discuss later on' more than a real stylist would like, and the number times I refer to other chapters is excessive), but there are some points I should perhaps draw your attention to before you leap in.
I will often write chunks of code as you would put them in a file for execution (a `script' or a `function', the differences to be discussed passim):
if [[ $ZSH_VERSION = 3.* ]]; then
print This is a release of the third version of zsh.
else
print This is either very new or very old.
fi
but sometimes I will show both what you type into a shell interactively,
and what the shell throws back at you:
% print $ZSH_VERSION 3.1.9 % print $CPUTYPE i586Here, `
%' shows the prompt the shell puts up to tell you it is
expecting input (and the space immediately after is part of it). Actually,
you probably see something before the percent sign like the name of the
machine or your user name, or maybe something fancier. I've pruned it to
the minimum to avoid confusion, and kept it as reminder that this is the
line you type.
If you're reading an electronic version of this guide, and want to copy
lines with the `%' in front into a terminal to be executed, there's a
neat way of doing this where you don't even have to edit the line first:
alias %=' 'Then
% at the start of a line is turned into nothing whatsoever; the
space just indicates that any following aliases should be expanded. So the
line `% print $CPUTYPE' will ignore the `%' and execute the rest of
the line. (I hope it's obvious, but your own prompt is always ignored;
this is just if you copy the prompts from the guide into the shell.)
There are lots of different types of object in zsh, but one of the most
common is parameters, which I will always show with a `$' sign in
front, like `$ZSH_VERSION', to remind you they are parameters. You
need to remember that when you're setting or fiddling with the parameter
itself, rather than its value, you omit the `$'. When you do and don't
need it should become clearer as we go along.
The other objects I'll show specially are shell options --- choices about
how the shell is to work --- which I write like this: `SH_WORD_SPLIT',
`NO_NOMATCH', `ZLE'. Again, that's not the whole story since
whenever the shell expects options you can write them in upper or lower
case with as many or as few underscores as you like; and often in code
chunks I'll use the simplest form instead: `shwordsplit',
`nonomatch', `zle'. If you're philosophical you can think of it as
expressing the category difference between talking about programming and
actual programming, but really it's just me being inconsistent.
You may find it odd that I use three hyphens to signify a dash. That's actually a convention used in the printed version of this guide, which is made with LaTeX. One day, I will turn this into a macro and it will appear properly in other versions; but then, one day the universe will come to an end.
I am grateful for comments from various zsh users. In particular, I have had detailed comments and corrections from Bart Schaefer, Sven `Mr Completion' Wischnowsky and Oliver Kiddle. It's usual to add that any remaining errors are my own, but that's so stark staringly obvious as to be ridiculous. I mean, who wrote this? Never mind.
Most of this written on one or another release of Linux Mandrake (a derivative of Red Hat), with the usual GNU and XFree86 tools. Since all of this was free, it only seems fair to say `thank you' for the gift. It also works a lot better than the operating system that came with this particular PC.